Intercom lookalike domains

What kind of lookalikes

Lookalikes per week

Endings

The 8 most used of the 19 top-level domains these lookalikes sit under.

Where they are registered

For the 51 with a registrar in WHOIS (64% of all). Brand-protection registrars mostly hold defensive registrations made by brands themselves, so a domain there is more likely the brand's own than an imitation.

What the live ones do

14 of these lookalikes were registered and checked for a website and mail: 11 (79%) served a website and 11 (79%) publish MX records, so they can receive email. Checks run on the higher-severity matches that resolve, not on every lookalike.

2 were tracked while live and 0 have since gone down. See what to do about a lookalike.

Recent examples

The 10 most recent, written with [.] so they cannot be clicked. The brand's own domains and registrations held by brand-protection registrars are left out. A lookalike resembles Intercom; it is not necessarily malicious, and none of these is a claim about who registered it or why.

• intercomhelpcenter[.]com
  Combo, Oct 11Not checked
• tv-intercomcenter-rheinmain-website[.]de
  Combo, Oct 9MX records
• intercomservice[.]com
  Combo, Oct 1No site or mail when checked
• interc0m[.]com
  Homoglyph, Aug 27Not checked
• intercol[.]com
  Typo, Aug 6Not checked
• intercomi[.]com
  Typo, Jul 29Not checked
• myintercom[.]co[.]za
  Combo, Jul 20Not checked
• intercom1[.]com
  Typo, Jul 20Not checked
• interfom[.]com
  Typo, Jul 16Not checked
• ntercom[.]com
  Typo, Jul 9Not checked

Further reading

• What combosquatting is, with examples
• Homoglyph and punycode domains, explained
• How to find lookalike domains of your own company
• What to do about a lookalike domain
• The weekly lookalike domain report, across all monitored brands